tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8646341630550570562009-10-30T22:27:06.277-07:00STEP 1: Call the 5-minute recording every freedom-lover needs to hear. STEP 2: Study this web site to learn about the threat of radical islam. STEP 3: Find 3 people who will repeat steps 1, 2 and 3 just as you have. (Repeat these 3 simple steps Until Islam Is Exposed To The World)Sharonahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14562438965004803530sharona@talkaboutsex.tvBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-864634163055057056.post-74389363063326717482007-08-08T17:57:00.000-07:002007-08-08T18:30:12.694-07:00“No Substitute for Victory” The Defeat of Islamic Totalitarianism<br />~John David Lewis<br /><br />The need to understand the gravity of this situation—and our capacity to prevent a catastrophe—is particularly urgent at this moment in time. It is obvious that the defeat of the Republicans in the 2006 mid-term elections was a repudiation of President Bush’s policies in this war. But it is more important to understand that President Bush has not mounted an offensive strategy, and that an offensive strategy is not the reason why American troops are dying in Iraq. There has been no drive to victory, only a string of casualties and the progressive discouragement of the American people. As a result, our primary enemy has been strengthened, and allowed to address the world as a leader just a few blocks from Ground Zero in New York City. (Imagine Hitler being granted this privilege.) Bush’s war strategy of non-war has resulted in a functional paralysis caused by our self-imposed failure to identify and confront open and avowed enemies.<br /><br />What has been demonstrably repudiated by the actions of the Bush administration is not the first of the options I presented, but the second. What has been tried and has failed are the altruistic, pragmatic policies of an administration that is as desperate to appear tough as it is to avoid being tough. The Democrats—the party that won World War II by dropping two atomic bombs—have an opportunity to regain a position of moral stature before the American people. Should they not do so—should they choose to retreat—then their unwillingness to value the lives of American citizens over the lives of foreign enemies will be made clear, and the Democrats will be seen as no better, no more principled, no more courageous, and no more American than the Republicans.<br /><br />Our military capacities are not in doubt today. It is our moral self-confidence that is in question. What was it that stopped us from confronting Iran in 1979, except a lack of confidence in our own rightness, and an unwillingness to defend ourselves for our own sakes? Had we removed the Iranian regime in 1979, thousands of Americans would have been saved, and children across the world would not have grown up with sword verses rising in their minds as they give their lives to jihad. Consider the Japanese—and ask whether it would have been in our interest to have left the regime of 1945 in power, to continue preaching religious militarism and training kamikaze. The best thing Americans did for themselves (and, incidentally, the kindest thing for the Japanese) was to burn that regime to the ground. So it is today. The Islamic State—Totalitarian Islam—must go. And it is the moral responsibility of every American to demand it.<br /><br />For the full text of this article, go to <a href="http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-winter/no-substitute-for-victory.asp">http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-winter/no-substitute-for-victory.asp</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/864634163055057056-7438936306332671748?l=jihadhotline.blogspot.com'/></div>Sharonahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14562438965004803530sharona@talkaboutsex.tv8